![]() ![]() According to Politico, McCarthy will “try to smooth things over,” believing that “it’s in his interest to be on Trump’s good side.” Presumably, McCarthy is also going to walk back his initial, disloyal comments about Trump being responsible for the attack. In case anyone was holding out hope that McCarthy was sitting down with Trump to explain to him that he’s no longer president and will therefore have to relinquish the stranglehold on the party he’s had for the last four years, Politico reports that he is in fact there to make nice with the guy who, again, has made the GOP the party of violent insurrections. A date for which they had to fly 1,000 miles in the middle of a pandemic. government, one of the most powerful Republicans in Congress who could, if he wanted to, decide to consign Trump to the scrap heap of political history is…meeting with him at his private club. Yes, three weeks after the 45th president of the United States incited an insurrection against the U.S. Enough is enough.” Now, in a turn of events that should shock exactly no one, they’ve gone from “Trump did something really bad and we’re done with him” to “Hey, big guy, my flight lands at 11 a.m., hope to be by your place before noon! Can’t wait, missed you tons! You want me to pick up anything on my way? Bottle of Diet Coke? Dessert? I know how you love those Little Debbie snack cakes.” Speaking on the Senate floor, Lindsey Graham told his colleagues, “Trump and I, we’ve had a hell of a journey,” but “all I can say is count me out. He should have immediately denounced the mob when he saw what was unfolding,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy proclaimed. “The president bears responsibility for Wednesday’s attack on Congress by mob rioters. This factor may be attached to the raid size rather than the colonist softcap, but it seems too coincidental to not exist.In the wake of the deadly attack on Capitol Hill incited by former president Donald Trump, a few top Republicans read the room and decided it wouldn’t be a great look to condone violence or the instigator of said violence. With a colony of 13+ I'd still get similar number of downed pawns per raid as I did with a somewhat lower population count, but the raids consist of larger zergs, thus according to my logic something must be balancing the odds if I'm still getting comparable number of prisoners out of raids. I haven't bothered to look into the C# code on this though, as I don't really like the spaghetti of that language so can't truthfully confirm.īut from my personal experience, call it a bias if you will, from scenarios where I start my pawns off with charge rifles (which have great armor piercing, but is otherwise gentle enough on unprotected skin to not blow off limbs at the same rate as other end-game weapons) I have to say the number of pawns that gets downed each raid steadily drops off when compared to the number of raiders per raid. One of the prime areas that affect pawn recruitment is pawns downed in raids, thus it would be weird if that wasn't affected by the softcap. Originally posted by ShadowTani:(I believe they are unaffected by the kill chance penalty that increases with the number of colonists)(which doesn't exist) In the XML files for the storytellers you'll find a tag for populationIntentFactorFromPopCurve with a list of values attached to certain population tiers, these values affect whether the game will actively try to give you pawns or prevent it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |